Should Doctors Be Allowed to Deny Care to Unvaccinated Patients? Comments

Here is how I got my FICO score to 785 from as low as 430, due to my diabetic condition I got a set back on my payments owing to medical bills, my world started falling apart because I wanted to rent a home and take some loans and I couldn’t. I kept looking for someone who could help fix my credit to no avail, until May this year when I met Hack West through a friend whom they had worked for. They boosted my credit in 9 days and restored my dignity. I was able to get a loan and pay for a home. You can contact them via HACKWEST@WRITEME.COMor Whatsapp:+1 424 307 2638.

When you choose to vaccinate, it is not without consequences. Doctors have every right to refuse treatment if they feel that is what is appropriate. Picking and choosing which medical treatment you will and won’t follow based on outdated research that has been proven false over and over again, resulting in some of the doctors that published those reports to have had their medical licenses revoked, is foolish at best. And very dangerous. You are not going to permitted to endanger yourself, your children, and others due to your false unsubstantiated beliefs. I would absolutely also support, and vote for, legislation that would allow legal action to be taken against parents that refuse to vaccinate.

People are waking up to the fact that the risk of injury from the vaccines is greater than the risk if illness injury. Many vaccines do not work at all or do not work well. I think parents should fire providers who don't want to work with them on a more humane or even an absent vaccine schedule. There are thousands of studies showing harm from vaccines: http://medscienceresearch.com/ Many of us were provaccine until our children were hurt by them. The children today have more neurological and autoimmune issues than ever before. The schools can't keep up with all the IEPs and 504 plans. There are 3 year waiting lists for kids to see the developmental pediatrician or pediatric neurologist. The remedy is worst than the diseases as far as vaccines go. Sacrifice your kid at your own risk. I wish I hadn't.

I work in a preschool environment and see many children with multiple diagnoses...autism, ADHD, ADD, OCD, ODD, etc. Our program is now overwhelmed with children who have had their vaccinations on a schedule right out of the womb. I did the same thing with my own children (4 boys) who all have some sort of anxiety disorders. I was a stay at home mom until my youngest entered Kindergarten. I cannot say that the vaccinations caused their disorders, however I have not seen irrefutable evidence to positively say that vaccinations don't cause those disorders either. I believe that vaccinations are the best preventive tools we have right now, however people should have the right to decide for their own children. One of my sons reacted to a shot that made his brain swell....he could have died. As an adult he decided to get Hep A shot that made him so sick he went to the hospital severely dehydrated. He no longer gets shots....he could die with the shot or without the shot. I think doctors have a right to do what they feel best for their own business purposes, but when the government decides to make every parent vaccinate their child/children, then there is a problem with that for me. I have a solution that may help...until we know FOR SURE that vaccinations DON'T cause disorders, infants should be scheduled one shot at a time so their bodies can get used to them. If there is a negative reaction, then the doctor/parent can decide to vaccinate/not vaccinate. Also if moms are lucky enough to stay at home with their children until they enter school, either start shots at 2 or 3 years old one at a time to check reactions. I never received shots for school (polio sugar cubes came out when I was about 5 years old) and I had measles and mumps. Cannot remember that but my siblings all lived through those ordeals. I got chicken pox at 38 years old and even survived that. I had an infant son who had whooping cough at 2 months old, and another infant son who was 6 weeks old in the hospital with RSV. I think researchers are trying to figure it out, but with so many children with autism and numbers still rising I hope that a miraculous find will finally reveal the answer to the autism pandemic.

The doctors are not doing this for themselves; they have other patients they need to think about. The ederly and those with weak immunites could catch a childhood illness and jeopardize their lives. There is also a financial consideration of a possilbe lawsuit. They will not sue the parents, the would go after the doctor. There are plently of places when kids can get medical care. I see this as being blackmaill and certainly selfish. The doctors should be able to treat whom they want without fear of governmental control. . I would imagne that this adult did not want to look for another doctor because of inconveniece. This is just a tip of an iceberg. Within a few years there will be a severe shortage of doctors. It is best to find a doctor who will honor your wishes.

Some patients are not able to receive vaccinations. I know of a young child, for example, with cancer. HE cannot be vaccinated; but if this child is exposed to someone with a preventable disease - measles, chickenpox, etc...his life could be at risk. This should not happen to him, simply because someone else is a science denier. Vaccines have eliminated many, many diseases. It's science. It's a FACT.

If you want the "freedom" to put your child at risk, then I guess a physician should have the "freedom" to choose not to treat that child. If you believe that the physician has a responsibility to treat people in medical need, then maybe you should fulfill your responsibility as a person in society to help keep epidemics from occurring. The reason this country's relatively epidemic-free is because of that, and it's irresponsible (and, frankly, selfish) to ignore that.

Do doctors have the right to refuse treatment for people who smoke and get cancer, sleep round and get an STD, eat too much and get diabetes then I think they have the right to refuse treatment for those who choose to not vaccinate. If not, they are stuck with treating any and all despite their patients silly choices.

My thinking is "Yes", everyone has the right to decide whether or not they want to vaccinate their children. However in my day, we could NOT enter school unless we had our vaccinations, and to my knowledge, their was never a crazy epidemic of autism that derived from having these REQUIRED vaccinations! They were enforced to provide the safety of health amongst all the children. I recently had a friend whose baby died due to being exposed to an unvaccinated child in a day care center. The baby was too young to receive the proper vaccinations but due to the wreck less and irresponsible behavior of the parents of the unvaccinated child, they were responsible for the death of another child. Fine, if you don't want to vaccinate your child then keep them isolated from all other children. That IS your right AND YOUR RESPONSIBILITY!!!!

First, persons who use the science of vaccines or any studies should not encourage behavior that demonstrates a partial interpretation. For example when we say there isn't a 100 percent assurance that vaccines and Autism are connected misses the point. There are few studies, if any that are a 100 percent assurance of any sort. That is where we have statistical levels of confidence...such as 5 percent out of 100 or 1 percent out of 100. The stats therefore never usually say if you take this or that you are guaranteed a cure. Just does not happen. So your article encourages people, given iris not 100 percent sure to buy into their biases based on belief. That is a dangerous position that in part creates a potential public health risk. Example...if a child does not take their polio vaccine, and contracts polio...the parents who were in the MD's office may be more likely to contract polio...or those children too young for vaccines are at risk. The position of this article places the public at risk by providing a position that is indefensible, if science is not 100 percent then do as you believe, do not vaccinate. For that matter, statistically speaking we can never infer there is a scientific assurance...because it is not 100 percent. Shabby science...and unconscionable to use this kind of thinking for the public to make informed decisions about their children.