BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC

BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC
BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC 15615 N ORACLE RD STE 135 TUCSON, AZ 85739
About

BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC

BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC is a Chiropractor facility at 15615 N ORACLE RD STE 135 in TUCSON, AZ.
Years In Practice 42
Primary Specialty

Chiropractor

Services BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC practices at 15615 N ORACLE RD STE 135, TUCSON, AZ 85739. Chiropractors diagnose and treat common spinal misalignments that can occur from lifestyle or injuries causing pain, discomfort and degenerative conditions.

BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC may be able to treat; back pain, sciatica, neck pain, shoulder pain, headaches, sports injuries, and auto accident injuries.

To learn more, or to make an appointment with BACK TO BACK CHIROPRACTIC, INC in TUCSON, AZ, please call (520) 818-3774 for more information.
Consumer Feedback
(7 Reviews)
Service
5 star average for Service
Environment
4.5 star average for Environment
Expertise
5 star average for Expertise
Staff
4.5 star average for Staff
Recommended
4.5 star average for Recommended
Value
4.5 star average for Value
View All 7 Reviews Add a Review
Recent Polls
Did this provider rush your appointment?
No, I was able to ask as many questions as I wanted
Was this chiropractor friendly?
Yes
Does this provider give unbiased advice?
Absolutely! I always get sound, helpful, and completely unbiased advice!
Did this provider's staff seem to respect him/her?
Yes, I could tell the staff respected him/her
Was this provider's staff friendly?
Yes
by Anonymous xxx.xxx.220.153
August 22, 2013
Did this chiropractor pay attention to your problem area?
Yes, they really focused on it
Was it easy to find parking at this provider's office?
Extremely easy, and close to the entrance
Has this chiropractor ever misdiagnosed you?
No, they are always spot-on
Does the chiropractor customize their treatment to meet the needs of your specific condition?
Yes, their adjustments addressed my condition
Was this provider's office too cold?
No, it was fine
by Anonymous xxx.xxx.221.84
June 10, 2013
Add a Review