Directory > Podiatrist > MS > Oxford > R M Whitmore, DPM

R M Whitmore, DPM

Nearby

Podiatrists

Chris Varva, D.P.M.

Oxford, MS

Carey Williams, DPM

Oxford, MS

Michael A Conti, DPM

OXFORD, MS

R M Whitmore, DPM

OXFORD, MS
Get Featured on Wellness.com > Learn More
R M Whitmore, DPM
(2 Reviews)
> Get Phone Number & Directions
1306 BELK BLVD OXFORD, MS 38655
Update Profile
Report Incorrect Info
About

R M Whitmore, DPM

R M Whitmore, DPM practices as a Podiatrist in OXFORD, MS.
Primary Specialty

Podiatrist

Map and Directions
1306 BELK BLVD, OXFORD, MS 38655
Services R M Whitmore, DPM provides podiatry in OXFORD, MS at 1306 BELK BLVD, OXFORD, MS 38655. Podiatrists are able to treat conditions and disorders of the foot, ankle and lower leg. A Podiatrist may treat bunions, calluses, ingrown toenails, heel spurs or foot deformities.

To determine if R M Whitmore, DPM can help you, please call the OXFORD, MS office at (662) 513-6600 for more information.
Consumer Feedback
(2 Reviews)
Service
2.5 star average for Service
Environment
4 star average for Environment
Expertise
1 star average for Expertise
Staff
4 star average for Staff
Recommended
2 star average for Recommended
View All 2 Reviews Add a Review
Recent Polls
Were the waiting room chairs comfortable at this podiatrist's office?
Yes
Did this provider thoroughly explain the risks and benefits of your treatment?
No, they didn't even attempt to explain
Was this provider late to your appointments?
Yes, it ruined my schedule for the entire day
Would you refer this provider to a family or friend?
No, I wasn't impressed
Did a staff member acknowledge or greet you when you entered?
Yes, I was greeted when I walked in
by Anonymous xxx.xxx.97.174
December 12, 2012
Did you feel like this provider's office was understaffed?
No, they were fully staffed
Was this provider's staff friendly?
Yes
Were the staff members able to answer your questions?
Yes, they were able to answer my questions
Did you spend a lot of time in the waiting room at this provider's office?
The wait wasn't terrible, but it wasn't the best
by Anonymous
April 19, 2011
Add a Review